Here it is. Published before noon on the 18th! I think that is a new record.
So I got one layer 1, two layer 2s and two layer 3s. It doesn't help that I have recurrent and an aircraft training day in the mix. Eleven days off for 102 hours credit. That isn't good. I would have loved to not have the layer 5s and some decent four day trips. Good news is that I didn't have any parings replaced do to line constraints. That could have made my award really nasty.
Something has to be done with all theses junk multi-day trips in COS. I only wish the FAs had RSRs or some basic form of representation. I've gone to the SAPA DEN/COS RSR before and he basically said there isn't anything he could do for me. Apparently some of the Pilots have gone to him and his response to them has been to transfer to DEN. DEN pairings are much better. Heck, I could hold all 20 hour three day trips if I were in DEN but no such luck in COS. It's like being a new FA all over again.
Thursday, March 18, 2010
April '10 Bid's Strategy in Bidding and The Christmas Tree
Greetings Everyone!
Today, I will cover some aspects of bidding just to reenforce the basics. Also, since my Optimization post, we should all be very honored to have Terry Cox (PSP FO) contributing some very good and in-depth material. Terry is currently working on a book about PBS. In my talking with Terry, he brought up the very good point that the majority of PBS knowledge is tribal and in most cases it is the blind leading the blind. I have been in that boat before, but thanks to guys like Terry and Frank Bowlin, I understand more today than I did yesterday. Hopefully that trend continues.
Now, on to business!
As I mentioned in the Nuts and Bolts for April the flying has again changed drastically from March to April. The only thing constant is change. Which is to be expected. So, looking at the individual pairings (which are usually out on the 10th of every month, found under 'PBS' of the 'Crewmember tab of SkyWest Online) is paramount. I post the "Nuts and Bolts" for the next month of flying comparing said flying. For April my bid-package seniority dropped largely in part to some junior FAs transferring out of COS. This is both a blessing and a curse since I'll be awarded more hours (COS is on a 'D' package month for April) but I'll still be junior enough not to hold a line of all my layer 1s or layer 2s bids. The seven layers of PBS are so important and in my situation, I cannot afford to not use them all to their potential. I have to have a good dispersion of trips for all of my layers to ensure that I don't get bad trips. The term usually associated with the dispersion of trips in the seven layers is referred to as the "Christmas Tree" since, when properly dispersed, the green lines of the seven layers should look something like the side of a Christmas tree laid on the ground. In each layer you should include more trips than the layer pervious so that you give the PBS computer more options for building you a legal line of exactly the trips you want to have. Or to put it another way, if I can't hold all of my layer 1 trips I want what is in layer 2. If I can't have that, I want what is in layer 3 and so on. To the right side of the layers (See the pictures below) you'll see corresponding numbers. In my layer one I am bidding for 11 trips out of the 378 that I am eligible for. For the Month of April I have some preassigned training events that make me eligible to hold only 378 of the 465 total pairings for COS FA's (that includes both the FA and the FF of the '700).
Above is my bid. This is the "Proritize Layers" section of PBS, seen left. My Strategy this month was to aim for the high paying multi-day trips and go down hill from there. Since there were few of these trips that I found 'good' I included decent paying locals for layers 6 and 7. Now, it is a good rule of thumb to bid to your bid-package seniority and beyond in layer seven. In my layer seven I was bidding 48.1% while my bid-package seniority for April was 58.1%. The reason I can get away with this is that the upper seniority in COS bid for locals which leave the good paying multi-day trips for folks like me. Knowing how people senior to you bid is an unbelievable help. It really did the trick for my line award for March. Also, under the advise from Terry, I have bid for Max Credit in all layers except layer seven. Hopefully this will create no optimizations for my bid so I'll get exactly what I want.
Today, I will cover some aspects of bidding just to reenforce the basics. Also, since my Optimization post, we should all be very honored to have Terry Cox (PSP FO) contributing some very good and in-depth material. Terry is currently working on a book about PBS. In my talking with Terry, he brought up the very good point that the majority of PBS knowledge is tribal and in most cases it is the blind leading the blind. I have been in that boat before, but thanks to guys like Terry and Frank Bowlin, I understand more today than I did yesterday. Hopefully that trend continues.
Now, on to business!
As I mentioned in the Nuts and Bolts for April the flying has again changed drastically from March to April. The only thing constant is change. Which is to be expected. So, looking at the individual pairings (which are usually out on the 10th of every month, found under 'PBS' of the 'Crewmember tab of SkyWest Online) is paramount. I post the "Nuts and Bolts" for the next month of flying comparing said flying. For April my bid-package seniority dropped largely in part to some junior FAs transferring out of COS. This is both a blessing and a curse since I'll be awarded more hours (COS is on a 'D' package month for April) but I'll still be junior enough not to hold a line of all my layer 1s or layer 2s bids. The seven layers of PBS are so important and in my situation, I cannot afford to not use them all to their potential. I have to have a good dispersion of trips for all of my layers to ensure that I don't get bad trips. The term usually associated with the dispersion of trips in the seven layers is referred to as the "Christmas Tree" since, when properly dispersed, the green lines of the seven layers should look something like the side of a Christmas tree laid on the ground. In each layer you should include more trips than the layer pervious so that you give the PBS computer more options for building you a legal line of exactly the trips you want to have. Or to put it another way, if I can't hold all of my layer 1 trips I want what is in layer 2. If I can't have that, I want what is in layer 3 and so on. To the right side of the layers (See the pictures below) you'll see corresponding numbers. In my layer one I am bidding for 11 trips out of the 378 that I am eligible for. For the Month of April I have some preassigned training events that make me eligible to hold only 378 of the 465 total pairings for COS FA's (that includes both the FA and the FF of the '700).
Above is my bid. This is the "Proritize Layers" section of PBS, seen left. My Strategy this month was to aim for the high paying multi-day trips and go down hill from there. Since there were few of these trips that I found 'good' I included decent paying locals for layers 6 and 7. Now, it is a good rule of thumb to bid to your bid-package seniority and beyond in layer seven. In my layer seven I was bidding 48.1% while my bid-package seniority for April was 58.1%. The reason I can get away with this is that the upper seniority in COS bid for locals which leave the good paying multi-day trips for folks like me. Knowing how people senior to you bid is an unbelievable help. It really did the trick for my line award for March. Also, under the advise from Terry, I have bid for Max Credit in all layers except layer seven. Hopefully this will create no optimizations for my bid so I'll get exactly what I want.
That's the Strategy in Bidding / The Christmas Tree post for April! Now on to the Award and Reasons Report!
Tuesday, March 16, 2010
April '10 Bid's Nuts and Bolts
The flying has changed drastically in COS yet again. We've gained a lot of trips compared to previous months however the pairing length and block hours have gone askew. True, every month is different but in COS even small changes change everything due to the fact that it is a small domicile. The only consistency in pairings, that I've seen, are the ORD and SLC round-trip locals. While it is good that we've gained so many locals that lots of people want, there are those of us who want good paying multi-day trips. Last year I brought home over $7500 in per diem alone. I'm well on my way this year, but the TAFB to credit ratio is terrible for multi-day trips. Heck, there are only three four-day trips that the credit even comes close to 24 hours. We have one three-day trip that exceeds 17 hours and just three or four two-day trips that are 11 hours or better. That just doesn't make me happy. My only hope is that most of the folks that want locals will get them and allow me to take some of the good multi-day trips. I know of three people senior to me that will be bidding the same way I do. Last month I was shocked to see that my bidding strategy had worked better than I expected. I only hope that that same luck will continue.
For April we have 465 total total pairings (for FAs).
165 are on the CRJ200
300 are on the CRJ700
Pairing lengths for April include,
280 Locals
85 Two-day trips
23 Three-day trips
77 Four-day trips
In March we had 368 total trips.
138 are on the CRJ200
230 are on the CRJ700
Pairing lengths for March included,
163 Locals
60 Two-day trips
63 Three-day trips (are are crap compared to last month)
82 Four-day trips
For April we have 465 total total pairings (for FAs).
165 are on the CRJ200
300 are on the CRJ700
Pairing lengths for April include,
280 Locals
85 Two-day trips
23 Three-day trips
77 Four-day trips
In March we had 368 total trips.
138 are on the CRJ200
230 are on the CRJ700
Pairing lengths for March included,
163 Locals
60 Two-day trips
63 Three-day trips (are are crap compared to last month)
82 Four-day trips
Thursday, March 4, 2010
PBS Optimization
Commonly I have seen "replaced by lower layer pairing due to line constraints" in my Reason Reports. I understand that this occurs when the PBS computer runs an optimization due to certain situations. While I have seen it done in almost all of my awards, I don't believe there is a rhyme or reason for it. Here is what Frank Bowlin has to say about it:
Reason Report: Replaced By Lower Layer Pairing Due To
Line Constraints
Probably the least understood reason in the Reason Report is, “Replaced by lower layer
pairing due to line constraints.” The simple explanation is that PBS optimized. That is,
it looked at pairings from multiple layers within your bid as if they were in the same layer
and it picked a pairing from a lower layer that allowed it to complete your line when an
otherwise available but conflicting pairing from a higher layer did not allow a solution.
When Does PBS Optimize?
There are only three occasions when PBS will optimize:
1. You tell it to by bidding the Line Property, “Try to finish at this layer.”
2. You tell it to by bidding the Line Property, “Clear award/partial line.”
3. Your bid did not permit a full line meeting all user and system properties within
the seven layers you created.
Optimize = Try to Finish at This Layer
When you bid this property in a layer PBS still processes that layer normally. If a full,
compliant line is built in that layer, PBS stops and the bid does not optimize.
However, if PBS cannot finish your bid in a layer where you bid “Try to finish at this
layer,” PBS optimizes before moving on to the next layer. When optimizing, PBS takes
all pairings from all previous layers and treats them as if they were in the current layer,
trying to arrange them to complete your line with the current layer’s line properties.
For example, say you prefer locals. Also, say in layer 1 you bid for and got a really
sweet local that pays 5:25. Now, suppose that by the end of layer 1, PBS has only
found 42 hours of layer 1 pairings that it can place using layer 1 line properties, so it
moves on to layer 2.
Before looking at layer 2 pairings, PBS will see if the line properties in layer 2 will allow
it to award/arrange any more layer 1 pairings. PBS will then look at the layer 2 pairings
to see if it can find additional pairings to add to what it already built for you with layer 1
pairings. In your case, you bid for more locals and PBS was able to get your bid up to
just 10 minutes short of your required minimum (75 hours for RJ pilots, 80 hours for
Brasilia pilots and all flight attendants). Since your bid at the end of layer 2 is still 10
minutes short, PBS would normally move on to layer 3. But, in layer 2 you bid “Try to
finish at this layer” so before moving on to layer 3, PBS will optimize in layer 2.
In this example, say in layer 2 there was a local paying 5:40 that is available to you but
works on the same day as that sweet local from layer 1 that paid 5:25. Normally, PBS
will not replace a pairing with conflicting pairing from a lower layer. But since it is
optimizing, it can. During the optimization, PBS discovers that replacing the 5:25 credit
pairing with the 5:40 pairing allows your line to exceed the minimum required by 5
minutes and complete, so it does — it replaces the layer 1 pairing paying 5:25 with the
layer 2 pairing paying 5:40 and completes the line, stopping there.
If the optimization didn’t find a way to solve in that layer, PBS makes no changes and
goes on to the next layer normally as if it never optimized.
Clear Award/Partial Line
This property is almost the same as “Try to finish at this layer.” There are two
differences:
1. “Clear award/partial line” is the first thing PBS processes in a layer; “Try to finish
at this layer” is the last, and
2. If the optimization fails to solve the line with the previous layers, instead of
moving on as if nothing happened, PBS clears out all the pairings that were
initially awarded in the higher layers and starts over with a clean slate as if this
current layer is the first.
The “Clear award/partial line” property is useful if you’re bidding for one type of pairing
that you don’t want to mix with other types if you can’t get a full line of them. For
instance, continuous-duty-overnights (CDOs, “stand-ups”) don’t mix well with regular
pairings for most of us, so if you like CDOs you might bid them in the first few layers, but
then bid “Clear award/partial line” to get rid of all the CDOs before you bid for other
pairings.
PBS Gives You Seven Chances for Success
PBS gives you seven layers in which to express properties to build a line. To process a
given layer, PBS takes all the pairings meeting your pairing properties in that layer and
tries to arrange them (along with pairings from previous layers that have already been
awarded) according to the line properties of the current layer and those from PBS itself.
Thus, to be a legal line, PBS must meet:
1. Standard system-wide constraints such as legalities,
2. System constraints — found while processing the bids — of required minimum or
maximum credit that it must apply to you so PBS can solve the remaining bid
package with the remaining crewmembers and remaining pairings.
3. System constraints — found while processing the bids — of required coverage
dates on which you must work so PBS can solve the remaining bid package
with the remaining crewmembers and remaining pairings, and
4. Your line properties as expressed in the current layer,
Requirements 1–3 always apply, but you only get 7 layers for requirement 4. Thus,
expressing a line constraint that conflicts with a system constraint will cause that layer
to fail. If you do so in all 7 layers, all 7 layers will fail.
If PBS does not solve your line within your 7 layers PBS will optimize, layer-by-layer, as
if you bid a “Try to finish at this layer” in each layer. If one of those optimizations
succeeds in meeting all four criteria above, PBS stops and awards you that line. If none
of those produce a full line, then PBS will do two more optimizations:
1. With your pairings but with default line properties and system constraints, and
2. Using ALL the pairings that remain at your seniority with default and system line
constraints.
These last two steps usually produce very undesirable results.
Thus
You want to do whatever you can to maintain control of your bid by giving PBS the
necessary freedom to solve within your seven layers. As you can see above, if you
allow PBS to go past your seven layers, the results are often very undesirable. Thus,
by layer seven:
1. You should consider relaxing day off bids in case your desired day off falls on a
day that PBS determines is a coverage date, requiring you to work that day, (See
previous PBStips on this topic.) and
2. You should consider relaxing your “Target line credit range” (if any) in case PBS
has established a minimum required credit or a maximum permitted credit that
falls outside your range.
Optimizing under your control can produce very positive results, such as using “Try to
finish at this layer” that many people bid in all layers, or “Clear award/partial line” when
strategically appropriate. But, allowing PBS to do whatever it takes to solve your line,
including removing pairings that you could have held but conflicted in some way, can
produce very unpleasant results and is something you should avoid.







